Introduction
An Essay on Criticism stands as one of the earliest significant works by the English writer Alexander Pope (1688–1744). Published in 1711 when Pope was just 22 years old, the poem is the source of several well-known quotations, including "To err is human; to forgive, divine," "A little learning is a dang'rous thing" (often misquoted as "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"), and "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread." The initial drafts of the poem were composed in Abberley in 1707. Written in heroic couplets—pairs of consecutive rhyming lines in iambic pentameter—the poem follows the Horatian style of satire and primarily focuses on the behavior of writers and critics within the literary world of Pope's era.
During the eighteenth century, the verse "essay" was a well-established poetic form, drawing inspiration from classical works such as Horace's Ars Poetica and Lucretius' De rerum Natura. Throughout the poem, Pope makes references to ancient writers like Virgil, Homer, Aristotle, Horace, and Longinus, underscoring his belief that true literary taste is best cultivated through the Imitation of the ancients. One of the poem’s well-known lines states, "True Ease in Writing comes from Art, not Chance, / as those move easiest who have learn'd to dance" (362–363), emphasizing that great poets are crafted through skill and practice rather than innate talent. As is common in Pope's works, the poem concludes with a reference to Pope himself. The final critic mentioned in the poem, William Walsh, was a mentor and close friend of Pope, who had passed away in 1708. The poem’s reference to the Pierian spring in Macedonia, sacred to the Muses, has led to the frequent misquotation of the line as "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing."
An Essay on Criticism was met with fierce opposition from John Dennis, who is ridiculed within the poem. This led to Dennis being further satirized in Pope's later work, The Dunciad. Pope’s literary criticism borrows heavily from the Augustan Age writers, and the poem earned him considerable attention, expanding his circle of literary acquaintances to include Joseph Addison and Richard Steele, the co-founders of The Spectator.
The poem is divided into three sections. The first section argues that good taste in criticism is derived from nature and should align with the classical principles set forth by ancient writers. The second section enumerates the many ways in which critics have strayed from these principles. In this segment, Pope highlights the importance of onomatopoeia in prosody, asserting that sound and meter should reflect the actions described. The final section elaborates on the traits of an ideal critic and concludes with a brief history of literary criticism, listing several notable critics.
Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism seeks to establish guidelines for literary taste, both in poetry and its critique. Structured as an essay in rhyming verse, it provides guidance to aspiring critics while simultaneously satirizing incompetent criticism and poor poetic composition. Joseph Addison, who regarded the poem as "a Master-piece," observed that its conversational tone and seemingly loose structure did not detract from its effectiveness. He compared it to Horace’s Art of Poetry, noting that "The Observations follow one another like those in Horace’s Art of Poetry, without that Methodical Regularity which would have been requisite in a Prose Author" (Barnard 1973: 78).
Alexander Pope
Alexander Pope, the distinguished English poet, was born in London on May 21, 1688. His parents were devout Roman Catholics. Residing in his famous villa, Pope was frequently visited by the most renowned wits, statesmen, and beauties of the era, all drawn to the man who was the most celebrated and successful poet of his time. His Pastorals and several translations appeared in 1709, though they had been written three or four years earlier. These were soon followed by An Essay on Criticism in 1711 and The Rape of the Lock between 1712 and 1714. The latter, once completed, became the most elegant, airy, and imaginative of his works. Other notable works from this period include Windsor Forest (1713) and The Temple of Fame (1715).
In 1717, Pope compiled a collection of his works, including two of his most poignant and melodiously refined poems—Epistle of Eloisa to Abelard and Elegy to the Memory of an Unfortunate Lady. From 1715 to 1726, Pope was primarily occupied with translating The Iliad and The Odyssey. While these translations lack the raw simplicity, natural grace, and grandeur of Homer’s originals, they are nonetheless remarkable poetic achievements in their own right.
Between 1728 and 1729, Pope published his most famous satire, The Dunciad, which solidified his reputation as a master of wit and literary criticism. In 1737, he released A Volume of Literary Correspondence, a collection that provided engaging anecdotes and insightful reflections. A fourth book of The Dunciad, featuring many striking and beautifully crafted lines, marked one of his final literary efforts, along with a general revision of his works.
Pope passed away on May 30, 1744, and was laid to rest in the church at Twickenham. As his friend Lord Chesterfield remarked, Pope was "the most irritable of all the genus irritabile vatum, offended with trifles and never forgetting or forgiving them." Despite this, his legacy as one of the greatest poets of his time remains undisputed. There is, however, an inconsistency regarding his death, as some sources mistakenly state that he died in Chiswick in 1717.
Pope's literary work often blurred the lines between poetry and criticism, uniting various genres within a single framework. He addressed both poets and critics alike, positioning himself as a central figure in the Neoclassical movement of the early 18th century. As a master of the heroic couplet, he played a key role in shaping the literary tastes of the Augustan Age. Inspired by John Dryden, Pope perfected the rhymed couplet form, employing it with remarkable skill for satirical and philosophical expression. His celebrated mock epic, The Rape of the Lock (1714), stands as a brilliant critique of the aristocratic society of his time, cementing his place as one of the foremost poets of the English literary tradition.
Summary of Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism
Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism is a didactic poem that explores the art of writing and literary criticism, offering insights into good taste, judgment, and the role of critics. Written in heroic couplets, the poem is divided into three parts, each addressing different aspects of poetic and critical practice.
Part 1: The Nature of Criticism and Good Judgment
Pope begins by discussing the challenges of both writing and criticism, stating that poor judgment can be as harmful as bad writing. He argues that everyone possesses some natural ability to judge, but many critics lose their common sense in their pursuit of cleverness. Rather than truly understanding literature, they often focus on superficial aspects and impose their own flawed opinions.
Nature, according to Pope, is the ultimate guide for good judgment, and critics should follow its principles rather than rely on arbitrary rules. He praises the ancient writers, particularly the Greeks and Romans, who understood the harmony between nature and art. Critics must approach literature with an open mind, considering the writer’s time, culture, and intent before making judgments. Without this broader understanding, criticism becomes shallow and misguided.
Part 2: The Dangers of Pride and Superficial Knowledge
Pope identifies pride as the greatest obstacle to sound judgment. Many critics believe themselves to be more knowledgeable than they truly are, allowing arrogance to cloud their reasoning. He warns against trusting one’s own judgment too much and advises seeking the perspectives of both friends and rivals. True wisdom, he argues, comes from self-awareness and humility.
One of the most famous lines in the poem appears in this section: "A little learning is a dangerous thing; / Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring." Pope suggests that superficial knowledge leads to false confidence, while deeper study reveals the vastness of true understanding. As one learns more, they realize how much remains unknown.
Pope also critiques those who seek to be different for the sake of distinction. He warns against critics who deliberately oppose popular opinion just to appear intellectual. True intelligence lies in knowing when to agree and when to challenge ideas with humility and reason.
In discussing literary taste, Pope compares it to music, stating that great poetry should evoke emotions naturally rather than being dissected into mechanical parts. He criticizes those who focus solely on minor errors in writing while ignoring the beauty of the whole work. True criticism should recognize how all elements of a piece function together to create an emotional and intellectual impact.
Part 3: The Qualities of a Good Critic
Pope asserts that criticism should not be harsh or arrogant but should guide writers toward improvement. He advises critics to present their insights tactfully, as blunt truths can be more harmful than constructive criticism. He argues that truth must be delivered with elegance and respect, as good breeding and good sense should always go hand in hand.
Flattery and excessive harshness are both problematic. While some critics blindly praise works for personal gain, others attack everything they read, believing themselves to be superior. Pope condemns both extremes, emphasizing that true critics should be fair, honest, and informed.
He also warns against personal biases in criticism. Many critics favor works that align with their own beliefs or political affiliations rather than judging based on merit. He urges critics to evaluate literature objectively, without allowing personal grudges or partisan leanings to interfere.
The poem concludes with Pope’s famous line: "To err is human; to forgive, divine." He encourages generosity in criticism, reminding readers that everyone makes mistakes, and true wisdom lies in understanding and forgiveness.
Mimetic theory:
Originally developed by philosopher René Girard, posits that human desires are not intrinsic but imitative. According to the theory, people desire things not because of their inherent value, but because others desire them. This imitation leads to rivalry and conflict, as individuals or groups compete for the same objects or goals.
Mimetic theory is a philosophical concept that has a wide range of meanings in literary criticism and philosophy, including imitation, representation, and the act of expression. It is the first work which is not written in a prose form. It's written in mode of satire. This essay is neo-classical in nature. Neo-classical: it expresses when you are talking about the same views of an ancients work in a work.
Conclusion
An Essay on Criticism serves as both a guide for critics and a reflection on the literary world of Pope’s time. He champions the balance between nature and art, warns against the dangers of arrogance, and advocates for fair and thoughtful criticism. Through sharp wit and poetic elegance, Pope establishes enduring principles for evaluating literature, many of which remain relevant today.
Click the button below to read a related answer on this topic: